Honest brokers, technology, health justice: What are we learning? -Notable news

With the increased demand for elderly population and care, the need for a neutral or at least quasi -natural broker in healthcare and social services that can balance the conflict and balance of competing political parties. I am. Especially in the case of non -profit sector, this is the key to solving the problem and creating a more comprehensive, fair and effective system through transparent decisions.

In the past, securities companies have been emitted from other organizations that are often interested in areas where they are dispute, or are related to funding and states. However, this sector requires a more convincing ethical model for securities companies that use distributed governance, transparency, and comprehension.

The new promising approach is called DAO or a geographically distributed peer -based virtual model, so that the service recipients can supervise the services received. By distributing decision -making, this structure gives the power so that participants, families, and forefront workers affect policies that prioritize dignity, justice, and positive changes.

Need honest broker in healthcare and social services

The Cambridge dictionary defines honest brokers as “a person who is involved in discussions and opinions and talks with both sides to help them agree.”

Such neutral entities are important in healthcare and social service systems that have a lot of profits in opposition to power imbalances. These pure sizes and numbers create profits that contradict complexity between them. In some cases, there is a conflict between the organization and the funding of the state institution. Others, the state office is a broker of struggle between organizations about who provides services.

Many organizations try to act as a honest broker, but the true fairness is rare.

In healthcare, the tension between medical providers, patients, public and private companies, policies, and other practitioners creates a variety of benefits of honest brokers, and are well balanced and fair. Guarantee that a fair solution will occur. The vulnerable group frequently lacks the impact on decision making. Honest brokers can access evidence to stakeholders, enable information -based decision -making, promote transparency, build trust, and catalyze reforms as in integrated care. Masu.

Another example is to use the term “honest broker” to the guardian of the patient identity in the tissue data bank. Honest brokers collect and provide comprehensive health data to investigators while protecting individual identity and privacy. They are usually not part of the organization team.

In other situations, honest securities companies are more related to social relationships in evolving debate and management of diverse interest. Reliable relationships enhance broker’s perceived reliability and encourage more honest two -way communication. Brokers, on the other hand, are facing ethical dilemma and fair retirement while finding confidential information related to political strategies.

Many organizations try to act as a honest broker, but the true fairness is rare. The perception of fairness depends on the transparency of the interests and motives of the fairly organizations.

The use of an organizational structure similar to the stakeholders is part of a problem that builds real trust. By developing alternative structures and approaches, healthcare and social service organizations can create a process that can move more effectively for group resolutions, with indifferent organizations become honest brokers. Masu.

DAO approach

DAOS is one of the potential ways to spread the spirit and work of honest brokers throughout the system. DAO is generally associated with blockchain and cryptocurrency community, but DAO distributed governance approach can be applied in other contexts.

DAO is simply a virtual organization that is “decision is made by members or stakeholders.” As an elaborate author of Journal of Business Research, the DAO Governance structure includes “the transition from traditional brokerage to transparency, transparency, and distributed consensus mechanism.”

For example, the decision of the Community Health Center to allocate subsidies includes the Board of Directors and management. However, the DAO structure will enable all stakeholders, including patients, families, and other providers, to actively participate in decision making. With this comprehensive approach, all stakeholders can propose ideas on the DAO platform, such as expanding crisis intervention services.

Later, these proposals were openly discussed, supported data was shared transparently, and all participants have the opportunity to vote for proposals, and DAOs will be permanently recorded. This process, which looks like all members, promotes trust and accountability, hears and evaluated all voices in the decision -making process.

Such a distributed structure prevents any of the dominance by any entity and promotes fair deliberations among participants. This system guarantees that voting rights are distributed evenly among the participants or to balance the expression, which promotes the fairness and fairness of the decision -making process.

This balanced power distribution reassures all stakeholders, including medical experts, policy proprietors, and community health holders, for the integrity of the system and their equal status. Usually, alienated groups, including the elderly and disabled people, can form a process that directly influences them, knowing that they have not only the existence but also the voice and voting.

In addition, due to this Territory Ility, DAOS will collect conflicts, propose solutions, and respond in real time to stakeholders’ concerns, such as prioritization of community investment, distribution of subsidies and funds. You can do it.

Differences in the results of health

The DAO structure can also improve health care and revolution in several ways. The first is resource discount. This structure can be used to supervise the distribution of emergency response funds during the crisis, and all communities can guarantee that they will receive resources that need. In order to defend the patient, the group organized as DAO has been able to gather a variety of parties in seeking to increase Medicade funds.

In addition, you can manage subsidies to support home caregivers and personal care apps, and track funds transparently to ensure fair distribution. In some cases, personal care attendees are part of this, and both clients and providers work for organizational governance. For example, if Medicade is paying an add -on of services that are provided beyond basic interests, you can use a smart contract to support the compliance by automating funding.

Smart contracts should be considered tools, not a complete alternative to human decision -making.

DAOS offers interesting concepts for contracting. For example, DAO can guarantee that subsidies are used for their purpose or that community health investment is implemented as agreed.

This is a computer program in which the prerequisites and actions are part of the “smart contract”, which effectively the group reaches the consensus within the scope of work and agreement, and then automates execution and compliance. Operation standards and terms of use are displayed in the blockchain (common server). These cannot be changed and ensure the perfection of the contract.

To clarify, smart contracts can directly deal with qualitative or subjective criteria, but the effectiveness of the program requires a clear metric that can be measured. Since these evaluations require surveillance, it is necessary to consider smart contracts as a tool, rather than a complete alternative to human decision -making.

In some cases, if you include money, DAO can manage Esklow funds and release it automatically when contract conditions are satisfied. For example, this structure can be used to approve the release of funds to the clinic after a minimum number of patients received care.

Since this process is automated, the DAO structure can provide a compliance tracking mechanism and issue that information to all stakeholders. This process can also notify the milestone settings for the settings for achievement and the layout of penalties for violations, which reduces human errors and biases to enhance efficiency.

Issues for implementation of DAOS

The DAO process offers a promising tool for more decentralized and fair decisions, but has an issue.

Some stakeholders may need more Internet access or digital literacy. Some of the establishment of DAO is to evaluate the needs of the participants and train with tools and processes.

In addition, various benefits can lead to conflict with tragic ones among stakeholders. It can be difficult to reach the consensus, and technology alone does not solve this difficulty. Another task is that by implementing the decision, you may not be able to carry out all the decisions through a well -written computer program, so you may need additional mechanisms and intervention.

Despite these issues, DAOS is a complex and sincere broker because many actors are excluded from participation, reached joint decisions, and develop the mechanism to implement them. We hold important promises to use. Healthcare and social service system.

Healthcare and social services often face conflicts and conflicts caused by systematic inequality. By utilizing the comprehensive nature of the DAO structure, stakeholders can reconsider the decision -making process to give priority to justice, dignity, and meaningful participation.